Interverbal: Reviews of Autism Statements and Research
A critical look at science in the autism world
Thursday, September 23, 2010
"There are two subjects, indeed, which I shall claim a right to further as long as I breathe: the public education, and the sub-division of counties into wards. -Thomas Jefferson
I am writing in appeal that the readers will help with our PAWS program. The Presenting Academics with Success (PAWS) Program is an ambitious notion bringing together broad segments of the community to benefit elementary aged students. The PAWS program uses High School students, grandparent volunteers, and University Students to serve as academic tutors and appropriate role-models for our students. The PAWS volunteers will serve in a variety of sub-programs such as additional classes during the summer for at-risk students, English as a Second Language, Special Education, and afterschool/homework club.
After having seen the mock-up for the program this summer and having noted the measurable increases in student performance, I strongly urge everyone to help us pursue funding via a Pepsi Refresh grant. We need more votes to win and gain the grant money. One can vote by simply sending a text to the number 73774, and enter 102480 as the message. Or go to www.refresheverything.com Go under the $250,000 category and vote for the PAWS program. You can vote once per day.
Probably the most interesting argument Mark Bauerlein makes, is to insist upon his concern for...even high regard of the millennial generation. His second most interesting comment is insist that his words are obvious conclusions based on an objective review of data. Sadly, neither appears to be true.
Mark Bauerlein is a professor of English and produces the most data for his arguments concerning civics and humanities (surprise surprise). He trots out scary statistic after scary statistic. The problem is that his scary statistics are in isolation. He trots out the tragic performance scores of High School seniors concerning the foundation of our Nation, but fails to share any similar statistics for previous generations. References for previous scores that go back even just as far as the 80s are rare enough to be notable. Is it pitiful how few US High School Seniors know who James Madison is? Of course it is, but how do they compare to their peers in the 70s...60s...50s...40s? Having that sort of data to compare is not trivial to Bauerlein’s argument, in fact it is everything. He is arguing that there is something different about the current young generation... and that the difference is the technological culture popular among the under 30 crowd.
His arguments concerning science and technology are even feebler. He gravely informs us that roughly 3% less College students want to be engineers in the years post 2000 compared to the 90s. However, the most abysmal thing about Bauerlein’s work is the sense that it is cultural whining masquerading as concern for the state of the citizenship of the young. When the good professor laments the fact that in 2002 only 11.4% of young people saw a play and only 2.4% saw a ballet, I admit that I begin to view this former director of Research for the National Endowment for the Arts with a very jaundiced eye. Generationally based, cultural snobbery dressed up as alarmism I call it.
All visitors to this blog are welcome to comment in a manner they see fit. Vehement disagreement is permissible; however comments must be on topic, and must involve actual argumentation. No drive by character assassination or trolling please. Also, no services, events, or research recruitments may be advertised on this blog…period.
Violating posts will be removed.